Gloves are the exception that proves the Class I rule: low class, but a full premarket and testing burden. Here's exactly what applies.
Both main glove types are Class I — the difference is which regulation and product code they fall under:
| Glove type | Regulation | Class | 510(k)? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient examination glove | 21 CFR 880.6250 | Class I | Required |
| Surgeon's glove | 21 CFR 878.4460 | Class I | Required |
| Finger cot | 21 CFR 880.6250 | Class I | Often exempt |
Most Class I devices are exempt from premarket notification. Medical gloves are a deliberate exception. Because gloves are a primary barrier against the spread of infection, FDA determined that patient examination and surgeon's gloves — product codes including LYY, LYZ, OIG, OPC, OPH, LZC, and OPA — are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of health, and therefore require a 510(k).
Leak/pinhole (watertightness) testing to an acceptable quality level (AQL) — the core barrier test.
Tensile strength, elongation, and dimensions, before and after aging.
Residual powder limits — powdered gloves are banned, so residual must stay within accepted limits.
Skin-contact biocompatibility appropriate to the material.
Natural rubber latex protein considerations and required latex labeling statements.
ASTM specifications for rubber, nitrile, vinyl exam gloves and rubber surgical gloves, by material.
| Requirement | What it involves | Applies? |
|---|---|---|
| 510(k) clearance | Premarket notification with predicate + test data | Required |
| Establishment registration | Annual, in FURLS; $11,423 FY2026 fee (Oct 1–Dec 31) | Required |
| Device listing | List each glove product and its activities | Required |
| U.S. Agent + Official Correspondent | Required for foreign establishments (807.40) | Required |
| QMSR (quality system) | 21 CFR 820 / ISO 13485:2016 — effective Feb 2, 2026 | Required |
| Labeling, latex & UDI | Device labeling (801), latex statements, UDI | Required |
| Non-powdered only | Powdered medical gloves are banned (895) | Mandatory |
Exam or surgeon's glove, its product code, and — critically — that it's non-powdered.
Medical gloves need premarket notification: a valid predicate plus the required test data, cleared by FDA.
Leak/AQL, tensile and elongation, powder-free residual, biocompatibility, and latex requirements to the applicable ASTM standards.
Register in FURLS and pay the annual fee; foreign makers designate a U.S. Agent and an Official Correspondent.
List each product and ensure labeling meets FDA requirements, including UDI and natural rubber latex statements.
Operate under QMSR, keep listings current, renew each fiscal year, and manage import compliance to avoid detention.
FDA Registration Assistance handles establishment registration and device listing, serves as your U.S. Agent and Official Correspondent, supports the 510(k) and the testing it requires, and aligns QMSR and labeling — so your medical device gloves reach the U.S. market without avoidable delays.
Contact us at info@fdaregistrationassistance.com or call +1 (928) 275-8333. Trusted by device makers in 135+ countries, with 15+ years of FDA experience.
Yes — patient examination and surgeon's gloves are medical devices, because they guard against contamination and the spread of pathogens. They fall under FDA device rules: registration, listing, quality systems, premarket notification, and labeling.
Both patient exam gloves (880.6250) and surgeon's gloves (878.4460) are Class I. The common belief that surgeon's gloves are Class II is incorrect. What's unusual is that they still require a 510(k).
Yes — the key point. Though most Class I devices are exempt, FDA determined that exam and surgeon's gloves (product codes including LYY, LYZ, OIG, OPC, OPH, LZC, OPA) require a 510(k) due to their infection-control role. Registration and listing alone aren't enough.
No. Powdered surgeon's gloves, powdered patient exam gloves, and absorbable powder for lubricating a surgeon's glove are banned (21 CFR 895), effective Jan 18, 2017. Only non-powdered medical gloves may be sold; powdered radiographic protection gloves were the narrow exception.
FDA found they present an unreasonable, substantial risk — airway and wound inflammation and post-surgical adhesions from the powder — that labeling couldn't fix, so they were added to the banned-device list.
Typically leak/pinhole (watertightness) to an AQL, tensile strength and elongation, dimensions, powder-free residual limits, and biocompatibility, plus latex protein and labeling considerations for natural rubber latex. Specific standards depend on material and glove type.
FDA recognizes ASTM specifications for rubber, nitrile, and vinyl examination gloves and rubber surgical gloves, among others. Your 510(k) generally shows conformance to the standards for your glove's material and use.
Yes — a foreign establishment must designate a U.S. Agent (and has an Official Correspondent for registration/listing communications). The U.S. Agent is FDA's domestic contact for the facility.
The standard annual device establishment fee — $11,423 for FY2026, reset each fiscal year, paid Oct 1–Dec 31. There's no separate FDA listing fee.
No. Registration and listing identify your facility and products; a cleared 510(k) is a marketing authorization, not "approval." FDA doesn't "approve" gloves — "FDA cleared" is the accurate term where a 510(k) applies.
Yes — glove makers operate under QMSR (updated 21 CFR 820, incorporating ISO 13485:2016, effective Feb 2, 2026). Quality control over materials, testing, and release is central for gloves.
Natural rubber latex gloves must state they contain natural rubber latex, which may cause allergic reactions, and can't be labeled "hypoallergenic." Any protein-level claims must be supported.
Generally yes — UDI applies to medical gloves, so labels and packaging typically must carry one. Confirm requirements and any exceptions for your product and packaging levels.
Gloves are a very high-volume import category with significant enforcement against substandard, reprocessed, or misrepresented product. Shipments from establishments that aren't properly registered, listed, cleared, or standards-compliant can be detained or refused.
Similar but distinct: both are Class I and both need a 510(k), but under different regulations (surgeon's 878.4460, exam 880.6250) with different codes and some different performance expectations. Each is registered, listed, and cleared appropriately.
No. Selling medical gloves into the U.S., including online, without proper registration, listing, a cleared 510(k), and compliant labeling can lead to import refusal and enforcement — and marketplaces increasingly require proof of compliance.
It handles registration and listing, serves as U.S. Agent and Official Correspondent, supports the 510(k) and its testing, aligns QMSR and labeling (latex, UDI), and helps keep imports moving — for device makers in 135+ countries.
Contact FDA Registration Assistance at info@fdaregistrationassistance.com or call +1 (928) 275-8333 with your glove type, material, and intended use for a clear plan.